Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Emil Ruusuvuori Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Van De Zandschulp vs E. Ruusuvuori
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
30
Age
26
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
78
C. Rank
544
22
Best Rank
37
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$3.7M
Career Money
$2.6M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Emil Ruusuvuori
FIN
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
30
Age
26
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
78
C. Rank
544
22
Best Rank
37
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$3.7M
Career Money
$2.6M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 2 Ruusuvuori
They have played 10 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 5 and Emil Ruusuvuori winning 5. The last match between Emil Ruusuvuori and Botic Van De Zandschulp was at the Miami Open - Miami, 28-03-2023, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Emil Ruusuvuori getting the victory 4-6 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zandschulp | 1 |
| Ruusuvuori | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R4) Miami Open - Miami(03-28-23)
Emil Ruusuvuori
4
6
7
Botic Van De Zandschulp
6
4
5
(R2) Wimbledon - London(06-30-22)
Botic Van De Zandschulp
3
6
6
6
Emil Ruusuvuori
6
1
4
4
(R1) Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch(06-07-22)
Emil Ruusuvuori
4
6
6
Botic Van De Zandschulp
6
2
1
B. V. D. Zandschulp vs E. Ruusuvuori H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,738,275 | Career Prize Money | $2,614,675 |
| 60.83% (382-246) | Career Total W/L | 60.04% (290-193) |
| 1 | Grass | 1 |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 7 | Titles | 10 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 43.24% (16-21) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (1-3) |
B. V. D. Zandschulp vs E. Ruusuvuori Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45.24% of points on their second serve, while Emil Ruusuvuori has won 47.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Botic Van De Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emil Ruusuvuori has won 44.30%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.88% and 21.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 55.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emil Ruusuvuori has saved 55.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 48.44% of matches played (W/L 31/33), with Emil Ruusuvuori winning 40.74% (W/L 11/16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 97/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/15). Emil Ruusuvuori has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 106/53), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 49/56).
- Player level: In the last year, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 19/19), where as Emil Ruusuvuori has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1 times and Emil Ruusuvuori being victorious 2 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 5 and Emil Ruusuvuori winning 5.
- The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Emil Ruusuvuori was at the Miami Open - Miami, 28-03-2023, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Emil Ruusuvuori getting the victory 4-6 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:17:33.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 140.36 while Emil Ruusuvuori has played against players with an average rank of 261.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emil Ruusuvuori has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 30.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emil Ruusuvuori has converted 40.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Emil Ruusuvuori Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. V. D. Zandschulp vs E. Ruusuvuori H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 45 | Games Won | 48 |
| 21 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 2:17:33 | Average Match Time | 2:17:33 |
| 64% (170/265) | 1st Serve % | 68% (197/290) |
| 68% (115/170) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (136/197) |
| 53% (50/95) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (45/93) |
| 30% (10/33) | Break Pts Won % | 55% (11/20) |
| 38% (109/290) | Return Points Win % | 38% (100/265) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Zandschulp 48%, Ruusuvuori 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Zandschulp 51%, Ruusuvuori 50%.
Break Points Saved %: Zandschulp 58%, Ruusuvuori 62%.
B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Hellenic Championship - Athens - 03-11-2025 | ||||
R1  Stan WawrinkaS. Wawrinka | L | 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | ||
| Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025 | ||||
Q3  Ethan QuinnE. Quinn | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 Jenson BrooksbyJ. Brooksby | W | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel - 20-10-2025 | ||||
R2 Reilly OpelkaR. Opelka | L | 7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-3 | ||
R1  Jiri LeheckaJ. Lehecka | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
E. Ruusuvuori Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025 | ||||
R2 Otto VirtanenO. Virtanen | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1  Lukas NeumayerL. Neumayer | W | 6-4 7-6(3) | ||
| Brest Challenger - 20-10-2025 | ||||
R2  Francesco PassaroF. Passaro | L | 7-6(3) 6-7(6) 7-6(6) | ||
R1  Vitaliy SachkoV. Sachko | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| European Open - Brussels - 13-10-2025 | ||||
R1  Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardG. Mpetshi | L | 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-4 | ||
B. V. D. Zandschulp vs E. Ruusuvuori Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.83% (382/246) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.04% (290/193) |
| 57.84% (874/637) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.36% (655/487) |
| 52.97% (7595/6742) | Games Win/Loss | 53.08% (5815/5140) |
| 57.81% (74/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.17% (120/67) |
| 61.59% (178/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.67% (49/56) |
| 64.13% (118/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.05% (107/55) |
| 44.44% (12/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 48.28% (14/15) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 3139 | Aces Total | 1837 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 2297 | Total Double Faults | 1420 |
| 1:36:56 | Average Match Time | 1:34:1 |
| 393.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 393.8 |
| 62% (25788/41885) | 1st Serve % | 65% (20674/31971) |
| 72% (18493/25788) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (14675/20674) |
| 48% (7758/16100) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5725/11297) |
| 43% (1881/4385) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1327/3176) |
| 40% (17540/43322) | Return Points Win % | 40% (13051/32795) |
| 58.93% (33/23) | Slam W/L | 37.93% (11/18) |
| 48.21% (27/29) | Masters W/L | 50.91% (28/27) |
| 60.00% (12/8) | Cups W/L | 65.22% (15/8) |
| 51.30% (79/75) | Main Tour W/L | 56.95% (86/65) |
| 63.33% (76/44) | Challenger W/L | 61.79% (76/47) |
| 69.82% (155/67) | Futures W/L | 72.55% (74/28) |
| 62% (354/572) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (275/446) |
| 49% (21/43) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (11/29) |
| 53% (108/205) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (85/162) |
| 57% (117/206) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (77/138) |
| 89% (359/319) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (290/257) |
| 11% (359/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (290/33) |
| 23% (267/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (191/32) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
01:00 PM 12/11/25
Prediction
L. Djere1T. ParisWCW1
1.38
W2
2.76
05:00 AM 12/11/25
Prediction
K. IsomuraWCS. Shimabukuro3W1
5.55
W2
1.103
12:50 AM 12/11/25
Prediction
S. Baez1WC
A. G. MezaW1
1.25
W2
3.48
05:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionJ. K. Trotter5D. PoljakqW1
1.091
W2
5.85
04:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionH. BartonR. Sakamoto6W1
1.85
W2
1.83
03:00 AM 13/11/25
Prediction
M. PolmansA. Bolt6W1
2.35
W2
1.51
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Taylor FritzAlex De Minaur12:00
H2H 5-5
Jannik Sinner
Alexander Zverev22:30
H2H 5-4
Jannik SinnerBen SheltonH2H 7-1
Carlos AlcarazLorenzo Musetti13:30
H2H 6-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia